공급망 탄소 관리 소프트웨어 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the supply chain carbon management software market size was valued at USD 3.11 billion in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 3.60 billion in 2026 to reach USD 7.96 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 17.20% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This report is Segmented by Offering (Software, and Services), Deployment Model (Cloud, On-Premise, and Hybrid), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium Enterprises), Application (Carbon Accounting and Emissions Tracking, and More), End-Use Industry (IT and Telecom, BFSI, Manufacturing, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Supply Chain Carbon Management Software Market Trends and Insights

Rising Scope 3 Disclosure Pressure Across Global Supply Chains

The supply chain carbon management software market is seeing strong demand from companies that now need more rigorous Scope 3 disclosures across global supplier networks. The first CSRD filers reported 2024 fiscal-year Scope 3 data in 2025, creating a live benchmark for the level of evidence and repeatability that later filers now need to meet. ESRS E1 kept Scope 3 at the center of climate reporting, meaning companies still need to assess all relevant categories and apply consistent methods year over year. That requirement is difficult to manage in manual files because supplier data comes from many systems, geographies, and reporting formats. California's climate disclosure framework is intensifying the same pressure on U.S.-based multinationals, so the supply chain carbon management software market is no longer being shaped solely by Europe. The result is a faster move toward platforms that can collect supplier data, apply emissions factors, maintain audit trails, and support assurance-ready reporting at scale.

Adoption of AI-Based Supplier Data Harmonization

The supply chain carbon management software market is also expanding because enterprises are struggling less with missing data than with inconsistent data. Supplier emissions records often sit across invoices, product records, life cycle databases, and ERP exports, and each source uses different units, boundaries, and assumptions. That makes harmonization a core software task rather than a supporting feature. In March 2026, EcoVadis and Watershed partnered to combine supplier primary data with automated reliability grading, demonstrating how the market is moving toward confidence scoring and evidence checks rather than simple data intake. In May 2026, EcoVadis expanded the same network through Workiva, further connecting supplier carbon data with reporting workflows that require audit-ready outputs. As a result, the supply chain carbon management software market is rewarding vendors that can rank data quality, detect outliers, and move high-volume supplier inputs into formal assurance processes.

High Supplier Data Gaps and Poor Emissions Factor Quality

The biggest practical constraint in the supply chain carbon management software market remains supplier data quality. Many enterprises still rely on secondary estimates because suppliers do not provide complete primary emissions data, or they do so in formats that cannot be easily verified. That weakens reporting quality and also limits the value of downstream planning tools. The challenge becomes harder when generic emissions factors do not reflect site-level or country-level conditions, which can materially distort carbon baselines for global supply chains. SAP addressed part of this issue in its 2026 updates by adding more country-specific factors for agricultural and industrial commodities, indicating that buyer demand for geographic granularity is growing. Until supplier participation improves and emissions factor libraries become more precise, the supply chain carbon management software market will continue to face slower adoption among companies with fragmented sourcing networks.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Digital Product Passport Readiness in Export-Oriented Manufacturing
2. Procurement-Led Decarbonization Programs in Large Enterprises
3. Integration Burden With Legacy ERP, TMS, And MES Systems

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Solutions accounted for 68.74% of 2025 revenue in the supply chain carbon management software market, with software licenses remaining the largest component of spending. That lead reflected early enterprise buying patterns, in which companies first secured the core platform needed for emissions measurement, supplier data capture, and reporting controls. Buyers also preferred solutions because they established a common data model that could later support assurance, planning, and product-level analysis. In the early build-out stage of the supply chain carbon management software industry, this platform-first approach made sense because large enterprises needed a stable system before adding external advisory support. The solutions segment also benefited from SaaS delivery, which enabled companies to onboard faster and update their systems more easily across distributed supplier networks.

The services segment is projected to expand at a 17.65% CAGR through 2031, which makes it the fastest-growing component. That rise shows that many enterprises have moved past the first step of buying software and now need help using it across complex supplier ecosystems. CSRD assurance workflows, supplier outreach, data cleaning, and emissions factor matching are all work-intensive tasks that internal teams often cannot absorb. The ERM and Carbmee partnership reflects this shift by combining software capabilities with service-led execution to drive Scope 3 reduction work in manufacturing value chains. The supply chain carbon management software market is therefore moving toward a model in which services extend beyond setup to include continuous data management, supplier engagement, and decarbonization follow-through. That pattern strengthens vendors and partners that can support long implementation cycles and deliver measurable outcomes after the initial deployment is complete.

Cloud deployment accounted for 65.12% of 2025 revenue in the supply chain carbon management software market, making it the dominant delivery model. Cloud platforms gained early market share by enabling automated data ingestion from procurement, finance, and logistics systems without the need for extensive internal infrastructure. They also meet the needs of sustainability teams that want faster setup, lower upfront costs, and easier expansion across supplier networks. For many mid-sized adopters, cloud systems reduced the burden of maintaining internal servers while supporting live reporting needs. Cloud leadership in the supply chain carbon management software market also reflects how quickly regulatory and reporting requirements evolve, because buyers value frequent updates and easier feature rollouts.

Hybrid deployment is projected to grow at a 17.85% CAGR through 2031, which makes it the fastest-growing mode. This growth comes from enterprises that need cloud-scale connectivity but still must keep sensitive supplier or operational data within controlled regional environments. That requirement is particularly relevant in Europe, where data governance and residency expectations shape system design choices. SAP's footprint management architecture demonstrates this direction, as companies can calculate carbon data in cloud environments and publish results back to on-premises systems when needed. On-premises deployments still hold a role in defense, government, and tightly regulated supply chains, but they are less aligned with the need for fast supplier onboarding and continuous updates. As a result, the supply chain carbon management software market is increasingly favoring hybrid models that combine compliance control with practical scalability.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Component
  • Solutions
  • Services
• By Deployment Mode
  • Cloud
  • On-Premises
  • Hybrid
• By Enterprise Size
  • Large Enterprises
  • Small And Medium Enterprises
• By Application
  • Carbon Footprint Measurement and Tracking
  • Emissions Reporting and Compliance
  • Supplier Engagement and Data Collection
  • Product Carbon Footprint Assessment
  • Climate Risk Analysis
  • Decarbonization Strategy and Planning
• By End-Use Industry
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail and E-Commerce
  • Transportation and Logistics
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Food and Beverage
  • IT and Telecom
  • BFSI
  • Construction and Infrastructure
  • Government and Public Sector
  • Other End-user Industries
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Nigeria
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

Europe held a 34.56% revenue share in 2025, making it the leading position in the supply chain carbon management software market. The region moved furthest from policy planning to live implementation because large companies have already completed full Scope 3 reporting cycles under CSRD-linked requirements. The supply chain carbon management software market also benefits in Europe from the combined effect of CSRD, the EU Emissions Trading System, CBAM, and product passport preparation, which together create both corporate and product-level data needs. Germany stands out because its automotive and industrial supply chains face high exposure to both product carbon footprint demands and deep supplier data collection requirements. France and the Netherlands also remain important demand centers due to reporting adoption, import-export activity, and a high concentration of large enterprises.

North America represented the second-largest regional market, supported by U.S. multinationals, California disclosure mandates, and strong voluntary target-setting among large companies. Buyers in the United States continue to invest because they need systems that can support enterprise-wide emissions accounting across complex domestic and overseas supplier networks. Canada adds a similar need through carbon pricing and cross-border customer reporting requirements, which favor software with multi-jurisdiction reporting logic. South America remains at the forefront of adoption, but Brazil is building momentum as corporate sustainability expectations rise and green finance activity drives structured emissions reporting.

Asia-Pacific is projected to post the fastest CAGR of 18.12% through 2031, making it the strongest growth region in the supply chain carbon management software market. The region is being shaped by domestic climate policies and by export-linked compliance needs from customers in Europe and North America. China is pushing Scope 3 and enterprise carbon data higher on the agenda through its dual-carbon goals and the broader evolution of its emissions trading framework. India is adding momentum through the Energy Conservation framework, the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, and BRSR Core expectations for listed companies. Japan supports premium demand through GX funding, sustainability guidance, and listed-company disclosure pressure, while the Middle East and Africa are beginning to see earlier traction through enterprise decarbonization efforts tied to Saudi Vision 2030, UAE Net Zero 2050, and carbon policy development in South Africa and Nigeria.

1. IBM Corporation
2. SAP SE
3. Microsoft Corporation
4. Schneider Electric SE
5. Salesforce, Inc.
6. Sphera Solutions, Inc.
7. Workiva Inc.
8. ENGIE SA
9. Watershed, Inc.
10. Persefoni AI, Inc.
11. Plan A ESG GmbH
12. Greenly SAS
13. Emitwise Ltd.
14. Sweep SAS
15. Carbon Direct, Inc.
16. Carbmee GmbH
17. Cority Software Inc.
18. Diligent Corporation
19. Wolters Kluwer N.V.
20. Sinai Technologies, Inc.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Rising Scope 3 Disclosure Pressure Across Global Supply Chains
  • 4.2.2 Adoption of AI-Based Supplier Data Harmonization
  • 4.2.3 Digital Product Passport Readiness in Export-Oriented Manufacturing
  • 4.2.4 Procurement-Led Decarbonization Programs in Large Enterprises
  • 4.2.5 Carbon Credit and Internal Carbon Price Workflow Integration
  • 4.2.6 Embedded Carbon Analytics in ERP and Procurement Suites
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High Supplier Data Gaps and Poor Emissions Factor Quality
  • 4.3.2 Integration Burden with Legacy ERP, TMS, and MES Systems
  • 4.3.3 Audit-Grade Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Concerns
  • 4.3.4 Budget Sensitivity Among Mid-Market and SME Buyers
• 4.4 Industry Macroeconomic Factors and Their Impact
• 4.5 Industry Value Chain Analysis
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Component
  • 5.1.1 Solutions
  • 5.1.2 Services
• 5.2 By Deployment Mode
  • 5.2.1 Cloud
  • 5.2.2 On-Premises
  • 5.2.3 Hybrid
• 5.3 By Enterprise Size
  • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
  • 5.3.2 Small And Medium Enterprises
• 5.4 By Application
  • 5.4.1 Carbon Footprint Measurement and Tracking
  • 5.4.2 Emissions Reporting and Compliance
  • 5.4.3 Supplier Engagement and Data Collection
  • 5.4.4 Product Carbon Footprint Assessment
  • 5.4.5 Climate Risk Analysis
  • 5.4.6 Decarbonization Strategy and Planning
• 5.5 By End-Use Industry
  • 5.5.1 Manufacturing
  • 5.5.2 Retail and E-Commerce
  • 5.5.3 Transportation and Logistics
  • 5.5.4 Energy and Utilities
  • 5.5.5 Food and Beverage
  • 5.5.6 IT and Telecom
  • 5.5.7 BFSI
  • 5.5.8 Construction and Infrastructure
  • 5.5.9 Government and Public Sector
  • 5.5.10 Other End-user Industries
• 5.6 By Geography
  • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.6.2 South America
    • 5.6.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.6.3 Europe
    • 5.6.3.1 Germany
    • 5.6.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.3.3 France
    • 5.6.3.4 Italy
    • 5.6.3.5 Spain
    • 5.6.3.6 Russia
    • 5.6.3.7 Rest of Europe
  • 5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4.1 China
    • 5.6.4.2 India
    • 5.6.4.3 Japan
    • 5.6.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.6.4.5 Australia
    • 5.6.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.6.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.6.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.6.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.6.5.2 Africa
      • 5.6.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.6.5.2.2 Nigeria
      • 5.6.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 IBM Corporation
  • 6.4.2 SAP SE
  • 6.4.3 Microsoft Corporation
  • 6.4.4 Schneider Electric SE
  • 6.4.5 Salesforce, Inc.
  • 6.4.6 Sphera Solutions, Inc.
  • 6.4.7 Workiva Inc.
  • 6.4.8 ENGIE SA
  • 6.4.9 Watershed, Inc.
  • 6.4.10 Persefoni AI, Inc.
  • 6.4.11 Plan A ESG GmbH
  • 6.4.12 Greenly SAS
  • 6.4.13 Emitwise Ltd.
  • 6.4.14 Sweep SAS
  • 6.4.15 Carbon Direct, Inc.
  • 6.4.16 Carbmee GmbH
  • 6.4.17 Cority Software Inc.
  • 6.4.18 Diligent Corporation
  • 6.4.19 Wolters Kluwer N.V.
  • 6.4.20 Sinai Technologies, Inc.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment