헬스케어용 통합 엔드포인트 관리(UEM) 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the UEM in Healthcare Market size was valued at USD 0.76 billion in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 0.99 billion in 2026 to reach USD 3.93 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 31.75% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This report is Segmented by Component (Solutions [Device Management, Application Management, Content Management, Security and Compliance Management, and More], and Services), Deployment Mode (Cloud-Based, On-Premise, and Hybrid), Organization Size (Large Enterprises, and Small and Medium Enterprises), and Geography (North America, Europe, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global UEM In Healthcare Market Trends and Insights

Rising Need for Centralized Endpoint Security Across Connected Care Environments

The UEM in Healthcare Market is seeing strong demand because every unmanaged device can become an entry point into systems that hold sensitive patient and operational data. Verizon's 2026 findings showed that vulnerability exploitation, phishing, and stolen credentials remained the leading healthcare access vectors, underscoring the need for patching, application control, and identity-enforced access in a single platform. A 2026 review of the Stryker cyberattack found that attackers targeted identity and certificate management layers, the same control plane that advanced UEM platforms are built to govern. Netskope reported that regulated data accounted for 82% of data policy violations in healthcare cloud environments, indicating that endpoint risk often originates in cloud application behavior rather than at the network edge. That shift matters because hospitals can no longer separate device security from cloud access policy, session control, and device posture checks. As a result, the UEM in Healthcare Market is moving beyond device enrollment and into broader security orchestration across clinical workstations, mobile devices, and remote care endpoints.

Expanding Bring Your Own Device Adoption in Clinical Workflows

The UEM in Healthcare Market is also being driven by the widening gap between personal device use in hospitals and the formal controls needed to govern it. Imprivata's July 2025 survey of 400 acute care leaders found that 81% of clinicians turned to personal devices when shared equipment was unavailable, and 79% admitted to sharing login credentials to gain access, which creates direct HIPAA exposure. A 2025 JMIR Human Factors study at a major public hospital in Victoria found a BYOD security maturity score of 2.04 out of 5, indicating that many large facilities still rely on ad hoc practices rather than formal endpoint governance. The same study identified UEM as the highest maturity level in the device security taxonomy, which makes the current gap easy for hospital leaders to frame and prioritize. That means healthcare buyers are not simply funding device access; they are funding a way to close known compliance and accountability gaps that already exist inside clinical workflows. The UEM in Healthcare Market is therefore benefiting from BYOD not as a convenience trend, but as a control problem that has become too visible to ignore.

Integration Complexity with Legacy Hospital Information Systems

Integration friction with older infrastructure remains the strongest technical restraint on the UEM in Healthcare Market. SOTI reported in June 2025 that 65% of healthcare organizations still used unintegrated, outdated systems for IoT and telehealth medical devices, while 59% reported downtime or technical issues due to legacy system conflicts. Many laboratory, imaging, and hospital information systems still run on operating system versions that either do not support modern UEM agents or create policy conflicts during rollout. Integration also becomes harder when hospitals rely on HL7 v2 interfaces, non-FHIR environments, or custom middleware layers, which can extend deployment from weeks to quarters. Those timelines compete with day-to-day clinical operations and delay projects for already stretched IT teams, even when demand remains strong. The UEM in Healthcare Market therefore faces a timing problem rather than a demand problem, since many organizations want the capability but struggle to fit it into legacy modernization schedules.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Increasing Compliance Pressure for Healthcare Data Protection and Auditability
2. Growth In Remote Care Delivery and Mobile Clinical Access
3. Budget Constraints in Mid-Sized Care Providers and Public Health Networks

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Solutions held 70.32% of the UEM in Healthcare Market share in 2025, and demand remained concentrated across device management, application management, content management, security and compliance management, and analytics and automation. Device management, security, and compliance management stayed the most established layers because hospitals still need encryption, remote wipe, access control, and audit support across shared clinical devices. Application management gained ground as providers tried to control which clinical apps reached endpoints, especially as AI-assisted diagnostics and third-party telehealth tools became more common. Content management also drew stronger interest from imaging-heavy specialties that needed governed distribution of radiology and pathology files across mixed device fleets. The UEM in Healthcare Market continued to favor broad platforms in this segment because buyers wanted fewer disconnected tools and clearer accountability for policy enforcement.

Analytics and automation remained the fastest-evolving areas within solutions, as health systems began using endpoint behavior data to detect anomalies, predict device issues, and automate remediation workflows. Ivanti expanded its platform in January 2026 with agentic AI capabilities aimed at automating endpoint discovery and remediation, which matched the staffing reality of hospital IT teams that manage large device fleets with limited headcount. Services, which include deployment, managed support, and post-implementation optimization, accounted for the remaining share of the UEM in Healthcare Market and grew alongside rollout complexity in multi-facility environments. Managed service models gained traction inside the services layer because smaller provider teams often preferred outsourced governance over adding internal specialists. This mix shows that the UEM in Healthcare Market is rewarding vendors that can pair strong product depth with a delivery model that matches the operational limits of healthcare IT teams.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Component
  • Solutions
    • Device Management
    • Application Management
    • Content Management
    • Security and Compliance Management
    • Analytics and Automation
  • Services
• By Deployment Mode
  • Cloud-Based
  • On-Premise
  • Hybrid
• By Organization Size
  • Large Enterprises
  • Small and Medium Enterprises
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Chile
    • Colombia
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Netherlands
    • Nordics
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Australia and New Zealand
    • Southeast Asia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East
    • Saudi Arabia
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Turkey
    • Israel
    • Rest of Middle East
  • Africa
    • South Africa
    • Egypt
    • Nigeria
    • Kenya
    • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America accounted for 41.38% share of the UEM in Healthcare Market size in 2025, which kept the region in the lead on the back of strong HIPAA enforcement, dense health system networks, and high healthcare IT spending. The United States remained the main driver because the January 2025 proposed HIPAA Security Rule update specified technical controls, such as multi-factor authentication, AES-256 encryption, biannual vulnerability scanning, and annual penetration testing, that directly map to UEM capabilities. Canada and Mexico remained meaningful secondary markets because unresolved endpoint governance gaps still sit alongside telehealth growth and older infrastructure. Microsoft and Jamf held visible positions across North American healthcare because many hospital buyers already used their broader enterprise environments and could extend device control from there. In 2026, Microsoft added Intune Suite value within existing Microsoft 365 subscriptions, widening cloud UEM access for mid-sized health systems that were previously less able to justify a separate premium platform.

Asia-Pacific in the UEM in Healthcare Market is projected to grow at a 32.83% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, making it the fastest-growing regional market in the current forecast period. Japan is a key driver because its FY2025 healthcare cybersecurity checklist set a documented path toward two-factor authentication compliance by fiscal year 2027, which creates a direct timetable for endpoint governance upgrades. South Korea is also strengthening the backdrop through government-led digital health infrastructure expansion that increases the number of connected endpoints in public hospital systems. India adds another growth layer because government digitization efforts under the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission are bringing more clinical workflows and endpoint assets into managed digital environments. Australia reinforces the regional case because tighter data breach expectations and a 77% rate of unintegrated legacy systems in the 2025 SOTI survey combine compliance pressure with clear infrastructure gaps.

Europe remained structurally important in the UEM in Healthcare Market because Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and the Nordics combined regulatory pressure with mature hospital IT estates. Germany stood out after NIS2 came into force in December 2025, because hospitals classified as critical infrastructure now face stronger obligations around endpoint risk management, reporting, and executive oversight. Local providers such as Aagon GmbH and Baramundi Software show that region-specific compliance needs can still support specialized vendors even when global platforms remain active. The United Kingdom, the Middle East and Africa, and South America added supplementary growth, with the Middle East supported by hospital digitization programs in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, and South America supported by rising compliance expectations in Brazil and the growth of private hospital networks in Chile, Argentina, and Colombia.

1. Microsoft Corporation
2. IBM Corporation
3. Citrix Systems, Inc.
4. Ivanti, Inc.
5. Jamf Holding Corp.
6. BlackBerry Limited
7. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
8. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
9. SOTI Inc.
10. Hexnode Inc.
11. Baramundi Software GmbH
12. Scality, Inc.
13. Workspace ONE
14. Google LLC
15. Apple Inc.
16. Addigy, Inc.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Expanding Bring Your Own Device Adoption in Clinical Workflows
  • 4.2.2 Rising Need for Centralized Endpoint Security Across Connected Care Environments
  • 4.2.3 Growth in Remote Care Delivery and Mobile Clinical Access
  • 4.2.4 Increasing Compliance Pressure for Healthcare Data Protection and Auditability
  • 4.2.5 Cross-Facility Identity and Session Mobility for Temporary Clinical Staff
  • 4.2.6 Rising Demand for Zero Trust Policy Enforcement on Shared Medical Devices
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Integration Complexity with Legacy Hospital Information Systems
  • 4.3.2 Budget Constraints in Mid-Sized Care Providers and Public Health Networks
  • 4.3.3 Clinical Workflow Friction from Overly Restrictive Device Policies
  • 4.3.4 Limited Standardization Across Medical Device Operating Environments
• 4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
• 4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.8.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.8.5 Industry Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Component
  • 5.1.1 Solutions
    • 5.1.1.1 Device Management
    • 5.1.1.2 Application Management
    • 5.1.1.3 Content Management
    • 5.1.1.4 Security and Compliance Management
    • 5.1.1.5 Analytics and Automation
  • 5.1.2 Services
• 5.2 By Deployment Mode
  • 5.2.1 Cloud-Based
  • 5.2.2 On-Premise
  • 5.2.3 Hybrid
• 5.3 By Organization Size
  • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
  • 5.3.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
• 5.4 By Geography
  • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.4.2 South America
    • 5.4.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.2.3 Chile
    • 5.4.2.4 Colombia
    • 5.4.2.5 Rest of South America
  • 5.4.3 Europe
    • 5.4.3.1 Germany
    • 5.4.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.3.3 France
    • 5.4.3.4 Italy
    • 5.4.3.5 Spain
    • 5.4.3.6 Netherlands
    • 5.4.3.7 Nordics
    • 5.4.3.8 Russia
    • 5.4.3.9 Rest of Europe
  • 5.4.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.4.1 China
    • 5.4.4.2 Japan
    • 5.4.4.3 India
    • 5.4.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.4.4.5 Australia and New Zealand
    • 5.4.4.6 Southeast Asia
    • 5.4.4.7 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.4.5 Middle East
    • 5.4.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.4.5.2 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.4.5.3 Turkey
    • 5.4.5.4 Israel
    • 5.4.5.5 Rest of Middle East
  • 5.4.6 Africa
    • 5.4.6.1 South Africa
    • 5.4.6.2 Egypt
    • 5.4.6.3 Nigeria
    • 5.4.6.4 Kenya
    • 5.4.6.5 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Microsoft Corporation
  • 6.4.2 IBM Corporation
  • 6.4.3 Citrix Systems, Inc.
  • 6.4.4 Ivanti, Inc.
  • 6.4.5 Jamf Holding Corp.
  • 6.4.6 BlackBerry Limited
  • 6.4.7 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  • 6.4.8 Motorola Solutions, Inc.
  • 6.4.9 SOTI Inc.
  • 6.4.10 Hexnode Inc.
  • 6.4.11 Baramundi Software GmbH
  • 6.4.12 Scality, Inc.
  • 6.4.13 Workspace ONE
  • 6.4.14 Google LLC
  • 6.4.15 Apple Inc.
  • 6.4.16 Addigy, Inc.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment