만성 플라크 건선 치료 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향과 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market size is expected to increase from USD 24.32 billion in 2025 to USD 26.02 billion in 2026 and reach USD 41.79 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 9.94% over 2026-2031.

Global Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Treatment Market Trends and Insights

Uptake of High-Efficacy IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors

The chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market is benefiting from a higher clinical standard that increasingly emphasizes PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses. In the PSoHO observational study, IL-17A inhibitors achieved PASI 100 in 39.70% of patients and PASI 90 in 55.20% at 24 months, compared with PASI 100 in 32.80% of patients receiving anti-TNFa agents. A 2026 meta-analysis of 32 randomized controlled trials involving nearly 14,000 participants found that IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors were superior to placebo in Asian populations, with a log odds ratio of 1.40 and a 95% confidence interval of 1.17 to 1.62. These results support broader formulary adoption in markets where evidence in non-Western patient populations influences treatment decisions. Drug-survival evidence also favors newer agents, as bimekizumab, guselkumab, and risankizumab showed lower 2-year discontinuation risk than ustekinumab among bio-experienced patients. The chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market, therefore, continues to shift away from older biologic classes, even where those treatments remain important for patients with limited access to newer medicines.

Expansion of Oral Targeted Immunomodulators

Oral therapies are changing the chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market because they can reduce the practical burden of injectable treatment. Johnson & Johnson received FDA approval in March 2026 for icotrokinra, an oral peptide that targets the IL-23 receptor, for adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Four Phase 3 ICONIC studies involving 2,500 patients found that 70% achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment of clear or almost clear skin and 55% achieved PASI 90 at Week 16. The European Medicines Agency recommended marketing authorization for icotrokinra in July 2026, making it the first oral medicine targeting the IL-23 receptor to receive a positive CHMP opinion for plaque psoriasis EMA.Takeda reported that zasocitinib was statistically superior to deucravacitinib in a Phase 3 study during June 2026, with more than half of treated patients achieving PASI 90 TAKEDA. These launches and late-stage programs can bring previously untreated patients into the chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market when injection aversion, perceived safety concerns, or specialty-dispensing requirements had delayed care.

High Biologic Costs and Payer Utilization Controls

High treatment costs and utilization controls can slow the chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market even when advanced therapies show strong clinical outcomes. Commercial payer protocols often require patients to complete several treatment steps before gaining access to newer biologics or oral medicines. A 2025 analysis of 194 U.S. commercial step-therapy protocols found that 99.40% imposed more requirements than clinical guidelines supported, while 68.40% of psoriatic arthritis protocols exceeded guideline recommendations. The same research found that 92% of surveyed physicians reported a negative effect on clinical outcomes from these restrictions. The mismatch can be especially difficult for people with scalp, nail, genital, or palmoplantar disease, where quality-of-life burden can be severe despite limited body surface area. Thirty-eight U.S. states had enacted step-therapy protection laws by 2025, and the proposed Safe Step Act would require payers to respond to exception requests within 24 to 72 hours.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Emerging-Market Biologic and Biosimilar Access
2. Pediatric Label Expansion and Age-Appropriate Formulations
3. Longitudinal Loss of Response and Treatment Persistence Attrition

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Biologic Drugs held 58.32% of the chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market share within treatment modality revenue in 2025. IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors have become central options for moderate-to-severe disease because they offer high clearance rates and established long-term use in specialist practice. In network meta-analyses, bimekizumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab achieved PASI 90 as early as Weeks 6 to 8. Real-world evidence also found favorable drug survival for risankizumab and guselkumab, which supports continued use of IL-23 inhibitors.

Oral Systemic Drugs are forecast to grow at a 14.94% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, the fastest rate among treatment modalities. TYK2 inhibitors and oral IL-23 receptor therapies are the main reasons for this expansion. Icotrokinra's 2026 approval established a new oral treatment option that aims for efficacy previously associated mainly with injectable biologics. Combination regimens also retain a clinical role for high-impact-site disease and difficult-to-treat presentations.

Injectable therapies accounted for 57.62% of the chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market share by route of administration in 2025. Their position reflects the long-standing role of subcutaneous IL-17 and IL-23 biologics in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Guselkumab and risankizumab showed strong drug survival among bio-naive patients in Danish real-world evidence.

The Oral route is forecast to expand at an 11.55% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. Icotrokinra demonstrated that an oral therapy can approach the performance range of advanced injectable treatments, with 55% of patients reaching PASI 90 at Week 16 in its Phase 3 program. Oral options can reduce concerns around injection aversion and may simplify treatment initiation for patients and practices. The Topical route remains important by prescription volume but contributes less revenue because of its lower unit price.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Treatment Modality
  • Biologic Drugs
    • TNF Inhibitors
    • IL-17 Inhibitors
    • IL-23 Inhibitors
    • IL-12/23 Inhibitors
    • T-Cell Inhibitors
  • Oral Systemic Drugs
    • PDE4 Inhibitors
    • TYK2 Inhibitors
    • JAK Inhibitors
    • Retinoids
  • Topical Therapies
    • Corticosteroids
    • Vitamin D Analogues
    • Topical PDE4 Inhibitors
    • Topical Roflumilast
    • Tapinarof
  • Combination Regimens
• By Route of Administration
  • Injectable
  • Oral
  • Topical
• By Disease Severity
  • Mild
  • Moderate
  • Severe
• By Patient Type
  • Adults
  • Pediatric
  • Geriatric
• By Distribution Channel
  • Hospital Pharmacies
  • Retail Pharmacies
  • Online Pharmacies
  • Specialty Pharmacies
  • Other Distribution Channels
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • GCC
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East and Africa
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America

Geography Analysis

North America held 38.98% of the chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market share in 2025. The region benefits from high biologic penetration, a dense specialist network, and insurance systems that eventually authorize advanced therapy for many eligible patients. UnitedHealthcare's 2026 criteria included icotrokinra, risankizumab, guselkumab, secukinumab, deucravacitinib, and preferred adalimumab biosimilars as coverage options.

Europe is the second-largest contributor to the chronic plaque psoriasis treatment market, led by Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain. Germany's Arzneimittel-Atlas identified psoriasis among the 6 drug categories associated with the strongest statutory health-insurance spending growth during 2024.

Asia-Pacific is forecast to grow at an 11.67% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, the fastest rate among geographic segments. China, Japan, India, South Korea, and Australia are the central markets for this expansion. China is improving access through reimbursement updates and local regulatory approvals, including NMPA approval of Enstilar in April 2026.

1. Abbvie
2. Affibody AB
3. Alumis Inc.
4. Alvotech
5. Amgen
6. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
7. Boehringer Ingelheim
8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
9. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
10. Eli Lilly and Company
11. Johnson & Johnson
12. Leo Pharma
13. Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.
14. Novartis
15. Organon
16. Pfizer
17. Soligenix, Inc.
18. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries
19. Takeda Pharmaceuticals
20. UCB

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Uptake of High-Efficacy IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors
  • 4.2.2 Expansion of Oral Targeted Immunomodulators
  • 4.2.3 Improved Diagnosis, Specialist Capacity, and Reimbursement
  • 4.2.4 Biologic and Biosimilar Access Expansion in Emerging Markets
  • 4.2.5 High-Impact-Site Severity Reclassification Expanding Systemic-Therapy Eligibility
  • 4.2.6 Pediatric Label Expansion and Age-Appropriate Formulations
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High Biologic Costs and Payer Utilization Controls
  • 4.3.2 Safety Monitoring and Long-Term Immunosuppression Concerns
  • 4.3.3 Payer Step-Therapy Mismatch with High-Impact-Site Disease
  • 4.3.4 Longitudinal Loss of Response and Treatment Persistence Attrition
• 4.4 Supply Chain Analysis
• 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.6 Technological Outlook
• 4.7 Porter's Five Forces
  • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.7.5 Industry Rivalry

5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

• 5.1 By Treatment Modality
  • 5.1.1 Biologic Drugs
    • 5.1.1.1 TNF Inhibitors
    • 5.1.1.2 IL-17 Inhibitors
    • 5.1.1.3 IL-23 Inhibitors
    • 5.1.1.4 IL-12/23 Inhibitors
    • 5.1.1.5 T-Cell Inhibitors
  • 5.1.2 Oral Systemic Drugs
    • 5.1.2.1 PDE4 Inhibitors
    • 5.1.2.2 TYK2 Inhibitors
    • 5.1.2.3 JAK Inhibitors
    • 5.1.2.4 Retinoids
  • 5.1.3 Topical Therapies
    • 5.1.3.1 Corticosteroids
    • 5.1.3.2 Vitamin D Analogues
    • 5.1.3.3 Topical PDE4 Inhibitors
    • 5.1.3.4 Topical Roflumilast
    • 5.1.3.5 Tapinarof
  • 5.1.4 Combination Regimens
• 5.2 By Route of Administration
  • 5.2.1 Injectable
  • 5.2.2 Oral
  • 5.2.3 Topical
• 5.3 By Disease Severity
  • 5.3.1 Mild
  • 5.3.2 Moderate
  • 5.3.3 Severe
• 5.4 By Patient Type
  • 5.4.1 Adults
  • 5.4.2 Pediatric
  • 5.4.3 Geriatric
• 5.5 By Distribution Channel
  • 5.5.1 Hospital Pharmacies
  • 5.5.2 Retail Pharmacies
  • 5.5.3 Online Pharmacies
  • 5.5.4 Specialty Pharmacies
  • 5.5.5 Other Distribution Channels
• 5.6 By Geography
  • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 Germany
    • 5.6.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.3 France
    • 5.6.2.4 Italy
    • 5.6.2.5 Spain
    • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 India
    • 5.6.3.3 Japan
    • 5.6.3.4 Australia
    • 5.6.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.6.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.4.1 GCC
    • 5.6.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.6.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
  • 5.6.5 South America
    • 5.6.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.5.3 Rest of South America

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Market Share Analysis
• 6.3 Company Profiles {(includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)}
  • 6.3.1 AbbVie Inc.
  • 6.3.2 Affibody AB
  • 6.3.3 Alumis Inc.
  • 6.3.4 Alvotech
  • 6.3.5 Amgen Inc.
  • 6.3.6 Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
  • 6.3.7 Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
  • 6.3.8 Bristol Myers Squibb Company
  • 6.3.9 Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited
  • 6.3.10 Eli Lilly and Company
  • 6.3.11 Johnson & Johnson
  • 6.3.12 LEO Pharma A/S
  • 6.3.13 Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.
  • 6.3.14 Novartis AG
  • 6.3.15 Organon & Co.
  • 6.3.16 Pfizer Inc.
  • 6.3.17 Soligenix, Inc.
  • 6.3.18 Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
  • 6.3.19 Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  • 6.3.20 UCB S.A.

7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

• 7.1 White-space & unmet-need assessment