미국의 농업용 분무기 시장 : 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the United States agricultural sprayers market size was valued at USD 2.85 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 2.97 billion in 2026 to reach USD 3.63 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 4.10% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This report is Segmented by Source of Power (Manual, Solar-Powered, and More), by Product Type (Tractor-Mounted, and More), by Application (Field Crops, Orchards and Vineyards, and More), by Spray Volume Capacity (Low Volume and More), by Technology Level (Conventional and More), and by Pump Mechanism (Diaphragm Pumps and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

United States Agricultural Sprayers Market Trends and Insights

Broad-Acre Corn and Soybean Spray Intensity

The United States agricultural sprayers market still depends heavily on the scale and intensity of corn and soybean production. A broad and active row-crop base continues to support spraying demand, with corn covering around 33.8 million hectares and soybean cultivation reaching about 35.1 million hectares across major farming states. That acreage base supports repeated in-season applications, and the equipment used in those windows often operates near full utilization during peak periods. The real demand signal is not acreage alone, because many farms still run multiple passes through a season as weed pressure and crop protection schedules require. That raises wear on booms, pumps, controls, and guidance systems, which supports both replacement demand and upgrade demand. Resistance management adds to this pattern because problem weeds increase the need for better timing and better application quality. Consequently, the market maintains a stable demand for large-tank self-propelled and trailed machines, even during periods of reduced grower confidence.

Precision Input Savings and Selective Spraying Return on Investment (ROI)

Selective spraying has become one of the clearest value drivers in the United States agricultural sprayers market. John Deere reported that growers used See and Spray technology across more than 5 million acres in 2025, with average savings of nearly 50% on non-residual herbicide costs and 31 million gallons of herbicide mix avoided during the season. Those savings change the purchase decision because growers can now tie equipment upgrades to direct operating cost reductions rather than relying solely on labor savings or yield protection. Precision systems also help maintain performance on irregular field boundaries and mixed-pressure weed environments where blanket application is less efficient. The benefit is growing because label restrictions are becoming stricter and more documentation-heavy. EPA's dicamba framework underscores the importance of drift-reduction agents and application discipline, making nozzle-level control and boom automation even more valuable in daily field practice. As a result, the market is rewarding machines and retrofits that can deliver both measurable input savings and cleaner compliance records.

High Upfront Machine and Technology Cost

High purchase costs remain a significant barrier to faster adoption in the United States agricultural sprayers market. Precision-equipped self-propelled machines often carry an additional cost compared to baseline configurations, which many mid-sized operations find challenging to afford, particularly when farm income is under pressure. This challenge is most pronounced among farms in acreage bands that could benefit substantially from selective spraying but face tighter financial constraints. The cost issue is further compounded by the expense of advanced technologies, such as sensing systems, machine vision, and software subscriptions, which increase the overall cost of ownership. A survey indicated that machine vision weed detection was implemented on only a small percentage of dealer-tracked custom acres, despite higher dealer intent to adopt the technology. This indicates that price resistance remains a significant factor at the farm level. While subscription models and retrofit kits help lower the initial cost barrier, they do not eliminate it. As a result, the market continues to experience a slower adoption rate in cases where the potential return on investment is strong, but the upfront capital requirement remains prohibitive.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Farm Labor Scarcity and Operator Productivity Needs
2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Mitigation and Drift-Control Compliance
3. Commodity-Margin Volatility Delaying Replacement Cycles

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Fuel-operated sprayers held 56.8% of revenue in 2025, which kept them as the largest power source in the United States agricultural sprayers market. Their lead comes from the basic needs of large-acre row-crop farming, where long range, high tank capacity, and uninterrupted operating windows matter more than fuel savings. Large self-propelled units in the Corn Belt still depend on diesel power because they must sustain coverage across large fields without stopping for recharge. Manual and solar-powered systems remain in place, but they serve much narrower roles on small holdings, in greenhouse settings, and in specialty use cases.

Battery-operated systems are projected to be the fastest-growing power source, advancing at a 17.9% CAGR through 2031 in the United States agricultural sprayers industry. Growth is strongest in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) sprayers and in greenhouse or orchard robots, where short routes and lower noise levels make electrification practical. The emergence of smart battery-powered backpack sprayers highlights how suppliers are developing a premium battery segment even within handheld equipment. Even so, large-acre electrification still faces a hard limit because cycle time and charging constraints do not align with the tight spray windows common in row crops. The United States agricultural sprayers industry is therefore moving toward a split model where battery growth is strong in smaller and more precise formats, while fuel-powered machines remain the operating backbone for farm-scale field spraying.

Self-propelled sprayers accounted for 55.0% of product-type revenue in 2025, giving them the leading position in the United States agricultural sprayers market. Their scale advantage reflects the country's bias toward high-clearance, large-tank machines that can move quickly across broad-acre farms during narrow spray windows. The segment remains central in the Midwest and Plains, where farmers prioritize acres covered per day, consistent field speed, and compatibility with precision systems.

UAV sprayers are the fastest-growing product segment, with a 20.2% CAGR through 2031 in the United States agricultural sprayers market. Their growth is attributed to their effectiveness in hard-to-access terrain, specialty crops, and targeted spot-treatment applications, where conventional equipment proves less efficient. However, recent regulatory measures targeting foreign-manufactured drones have created uncertainty in supplier dynamics, particularly due to the significant presence of certain global brands in the United States market. This development presents opportunities for domestic manufacturers and alternative suppliers but also introduces risks to this rapidly evolving segment. In contrast, tractor-mounted, trailed, and handheld sprayers remain essential, catering to more stable and cost-sensitive applications compared to the dynamic UAV category.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Source of Power
  • Manual
  • Battery-Operated
  • Solar-Powered
  • Fuel-Operated
• By Product Type
  • Handheld
  • Tractor-Mounted
  • Trailed
  • Self-Propelled
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Sprayers
• By Application
  • Field Crops
  • Orchards and Vineyards
  • Greenhouse Crops
  • Turf and Gardening
• By Spray Volume Capacity
  • Ultra-Low Volume
  • Low Volume
  • High Volume
• By Technology Level
  • Conventional
  • Precision and GPS-Guided
  • Artificial Intelligence-Enabled and Autonomous
• By Pump Mechanism
  • Diaphragm Pumps
  • Piston Pumps
  • Centrifugal Pumps

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

1. Deere and Company
2. CNH Industrial N.V.
3. AGCO Corporation
4. EXEL Industries
5. Equipment Technologies, Inc.
6. HORSCH Maschinen GmbH
7. Jacto S.A.
8. Kubota Corporation
9. DJI
10. Ecorobotix SA
11. TeeJet Technologies
12. Pentair Hypro
13. Niqo Robotics
14. Verdant Robotics, Inc.
15. CapstanAG Systems, Inc. (Nordson Precision Agriculture)

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Market Landscape

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Broad-acre corn and soybean spray intensity
  • 4.2.2 Precision input savings and selective spraying Return on Investment (ROI)
  • 4.2.3 Farm labor scarcity and operator productivity needs
  • 4.2.4 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mitigation and drift-control compliance
  • 4.2.5 Orchard and vineyard autonomy adoption
  • 4.2.6 Retrofit economics for installed sprayer fleets
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 High upfront machine and technology cost
  • 4.3.2 Commodity-margin volatility delaying replacement cycles
  • 4.3.3 Tariff-driven component and steel cost inflation
  • 4.3.4 Battery runtime and charging constraints
• 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.5 Technological Outlook
• 4.6 Porter's Five Forces
  • 4.6.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.6.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

• 5.1 By Source of Power
  • 5.1.1 Manual
  • 5.1.2 Battery-Operated
  • 5.1.3 Solar-Powered
  • 5.1.4 Fuel-Operated
• 5.2 By Product Type
  • 5.2.1 Handheld
  • 5.2.2 Tractor-Mounted
  • 5.2.3 Trailed
  • 5.2.4 Self-Propelled
  • 5.2.5 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Sprayers
• 5.3 By Application
  • 5.3.1 Field Crops
  • 5.3.2 Orchards and Vineyards
  • 5.3.3 Greenhouse Crops
  • 5.3.4 Turf and Gardening
• 5.4 By Spray Volume Capacity
  • 5.4.1 Ultra-Low Volume
  • 5.4.2 Low Volume
  • 5.4.3 High Volume
• 5.5 By Technology Level
  • 5.5.1 Conventional
  • 5.5.2 Precision and GPS-Guided
  • 5.5.3 Artificial Intelligence-Enabled and Autonomous
• 5.6 By Pump Mechanism
  • 5.6.1 Diaphragm Pumps
  • 5.6.2 Piston Pumps
  • 5.6.3 Centrifugal Pumps

6 Competitive Landscape

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (Includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as Available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Deere and Company
  • 6.4.2 CNH Industrial N.V.
  • 6.4.3 AGCO Corporation
  • 6.4.4 EXEL Industries
  • 6.4.5 Equipment Technologies, Inc.
  • 6.4.6 HORSCH Maschinen GmbH
  • 6.4.7 Jacto S.A.
  • 6.4.8 Kubota Corporation
  • 6.4.9 DJI
  • 6.4.10 Ecorobotix SA
  • 6.4.11 TeeJet Technologies
  • 6.4.12 Pentair Hypro
  • 6.4.13 Niqo Robotics
  • 6.4.14 Verdant Robotics, Inc.
  • 6.4.15 CapstanAG Systems, Inc. (Nordson Precision Agriculture)

7 Market Opportunities and Future Trends