양자 소프트웨어 개발 키트 시장 : 시장 점유율 분석, 업계 동향 및 통계, 성장 예측(2026-2031년)

According to Mordor Intelligence, the quantum software development kit market size is expected to grow from USD 0.54 billion in 2025 to USD 0.64 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 1.87 billion by 2031 at 23.92% CAGR over 2026-2031.

This report is Segmented by Software Development Kit Type (Core Quantum Development, Hardware-Specific, and More), Deployment Mode (Cloud-Based, On-Premises, and Hybrid), Application (Optimization, Quantum Machine Learning, and More), End-User Industry (IT and Telecommunication, Healthcare and Life Sciences, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Quantum Software Development Kit Market Trends and Insights

Expansion of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Workloads

Tier-1 supercomputing centers, including Oak Ridge, Argonne, RIKEN, Julich, and the Barcelona Supercomputing Center, have committed to co-located QPU integration by 2028. This creates a defined procurement path for middleware and orchestration tools above individual platform application programming interfaces in the quantum software development kit market. The commercial contest is increasingly focused on control of hybrid workflow orchestration, where NVIDIA CUDA-Q and IBM Quantum Compute Service are key participants. CUDA-Q benchmarks showed that a hybrid algorithm converged up to 5x faster than CPU-only optimization loops, although this result comes from a company source. Cleveland Clinic and IBM published a hybrid workflow for the electronic structure of the 303-atom Trp-cage miniprotein in March 2026, using IBM Quantum Heron r2 hardware. The work broadens the expected workflow from QPU-only circuits to CPU-GPU-QPU environments, giving classical high-performance computing and data science teams a more direct role in adoption.

Government-Led Quantum Computing Programs and Research Funding

Government programs are shaping product roadmaps because their funding is linked to specific hardware and ecosystem milestones. In May 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce signed letters of intent for USD 2.013 billion in CHIPS and Science Act incentives across 9 quantum companies. The allocation included USD 1 billion for IBM and USD 100 million each for Atom Computing, Infleqtion, Quantinuum, D-Wave, and Rigetti. The Department of Energy announced Quantum Genesis in June 2026, targeting scientifically relevant fault-tolerant computing by 2028 and a user facility that integrates quantum and high-performance computing resources. EuroHPC systems inaugurated in Poznan, Ostrava, and Munich also require compatible software layers for scientific users. Emerging interoperability requirements may increase compliance work in the quantum software development kit market, but they also allow early adopters to influence common technical practices.

Limited Quantum Hardware Availability and Performance Variability

The quantum software development kit market depends on hardware that remains scarce and has uneven performance across vendors. Two-qubit gate fidelity ranged from 99.1% on Rigetti's Cepheus-1-108Q system to above 99.9% on Quantinuum Helios trapped-ion systems. Compiler and transpiler tools, therefore, need continuing adjustment for each hardware generation. This reduces the portability that cloud access is expected to provide. Hardware procurement often follows multi-year public budgets, while software releases can occur each quarter. The timing difference can leave software functions ahead of the hardware required for commercial deployment, delaying enterprise production decisions.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Rising Enterprise Demand for Quantum Algorithm Development Platforms
2. Growth of Open-Source Quantum Software Ecosystems
3. Shortage of Quantum Software Engineering and Algorithm Development Talent

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Core Quantum Development held 24.81% of the Quantum Software Development Kit Market share in 2025 because foundational circuit programming frameworks remained the starting point for many developers. IBM Qiskit and Google Cirq remained important tools in this category. Qiskit v2.5 introduced a multi-representation compiler framework that has begun to narrow the distinction between core development and dedicated compilation functions. Hardware-specific SDKs, including tools for IQM, Pasqal Pulser, and Quantinuum backends, serve users who need direct access to specific systems. Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Control, and Quantum Calibration tools have gained widespread use as providers pursue fault-tolerant demonstrations. Wider adoption of these tools depends on the hardware readiness targets linked to 2027 and 2028.

Compiler and Transpiler SDKs are projected to record a 27.14% CAGR through 2031, the fastest rate across SDK types. Every QPU architecture needs tailored compilation optimization because general circuit compilers still require hardware-specific tuning. Amazon Braket released Qiskit-Braket provider v0.11 in February 2026 with flexible circuit compilation for Qiskit users running optimized circuits on Braket-native backends, including Rigetti's Cepheus-1-108Q. Domain-Specific and Hybrid Quantum-Classical SDKs support use cases such as financial modeling, drug discovery, and materials simulation. Their adoption is tied to enterprise demand in those fields. The Others category includes specialized simulation and visualization tools. It is growing steadily, though it lacks the same demand drivers as compiler and vertical software layers.

Cloud-Based deployment accounted for 72.36% of the Quantum Software Development Kit Market share in 2025. Most users accessed quantum hardware through managed offerings such as IBM Quantum, Amazon Braket, Microsoft Azure Quantum, and IonQ Cloud. A local deployment requires cryogenic infrastructure, microwave control electronics, and specialized maintenance in addition to capital spending. Cloud access is therefore the default option for many users. Local systems remain relevant for national laboratories, defense contractors, and financial institutions with data residency requirements. IBM planned to install one of India's first quantum computers in Amaravati by September 2026, indicating a potential local-access model for countries seeking greater infrastructure control.

Hybrid deployment is projected to expand at a 26.83% CAGR through 2031. These environments route circuits across local simulators, local QPUs, and cloud backends based on circuit depth, noise profiles, and execution cost. This is more than a combination of access methods because it requires reliable coordination across different computing environments. NVIDIA CUDA-Q has sought this role, with company benchmarks showing up to 5x faster hybrid-algorithm convergence than CPU-only optimization loops. The expected co-location of QPUs at Tier-1 supercomputing centers by 2028 supports demand for hybrid-capable interfaces. Such interfaces will need to give scientific and enterprise users consistent access across classical and quantum workflows.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Software Development Kit Type
  • Core Quantum Development
  • Hardware-Specific
  • Compiler and Transpiler
  • Quantum Error Correction
  • Quantum Control and Calibration
  • Hybrid Quantum-Classical
  • Domain-Specific
  • Other Software Development Kit Types
• By Deployment Mode
  • Cloud-Based
  • On-Premises
  • Hybrid
• By Application
  • Optimization
  • Quantum Machine Learning
  • Chemistry and Materials Simulation
  • Drug Discovery
  • Financial Modeling
  • Cryptography and Security
  • Quantum NLP
  • Other Applications
• By End-User Industry
  • IT and Telecommunication
  • BFSI
  • Healthcare and Life Sciences
  • Retail and E-Commerce
  • Industrial Manufacturing
  • Education and Research Institutions
  • Media and Entertainment
  • Government and Administration
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Other End-User Industries
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Russia
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • Japan
    • India
    • South Korea
    • Southeast Asia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Nigeria
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America held 36.42% of the Quantum Software Development Kit Market share in 2025. The region combined a dense supplier base, deep capital markets, national laboratories, and major research institutions. U.S. Department of Commerce letters of intent totaling USD 2.013 billion in May 2026 strengthened domestic system and software roadmaps. The Department of Energy's Quantum Genesis initiative provided a 2028 target for fault-tolerant computing and an integrated user facility. Canada's role includes Xanadu and the Waterloo research cluster. Mexico remained at an earlier stage, with demand concentrated in academic settings.

Europe had a policy-led development path in the Quantum Software Development Kit Market. EuroHPC inaugurated quantum computers in Poznan in June 2025, Ostrava in September 2025, and Munich in February 2026, requiring compatible software for scientific users. Germany led commercial activity through mandates from Fraunhofer and DLR. The United Kingdom hosted Quantinuum, Riverlane, and Q-CTRL, which offer differentiated tools for compilation, error correction, and control. South America remained at an early stage of commercial development. Brazil had the region's most developed academic infrastructure through the CBPF and the University of Sao Paulo, but limited capital availability and access to hardware hindered broader adoption.

Asia-Pacific is projected to expand at a 29.16% CAGR through 2031, the fastest regional rate. China allocated RMB 121.8 billion, equivalent to USD 17.5 billion, across 3 regional quantum funds, while Japan directed JPY 50 billion, equivalent to USD 335 million, toward domestic quantum technology industrialization. Japan's program included support for Fujitsu, KDDI, and startup Jij. IBM planned its Amaravati installation for September 2026, which would provide a local access point for Indian pharmaceutical, software, and financial services organizations. South Korea's KAIST and national research programs continued to support academic demand with emerging commercial interest in semiconductors and materials in the quantum software development kit industry. The Middle East and Africa had early demand from the United Arab Emirates Technology Innovation Institute and Saudi Arabia's KAUST, but limited talent availability could delay commercial uptake.

1. IBM Corporation
2. Google LLC
3. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
4. Microsoft Corporation
5. Quantinuum Ltd.
6. D-Wave Quantum Inc.
7. IonQ, Inc.
8. Rigetti Computing, Inc.
9. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Inc.
10. Pasqal SAS
11. Classiq Technologies Ltd.
12. Quantum Computing Inc.
13. Riverlane Ltd.
14. Q-CTRL Pty Ltd
15. QuEra Computing Inc.
16. qBraid Inc
17. Oxford Quantum Circuits plc
18. 1QB Information Technologies
19. Quantum Machines
20. Infleqtion, Inc.
21. QC Ware Corp.
22. Strangeworks, Inc.
23. BlueQubit, Inc.
24. Multiverse Computing S.L.
25. Terra Quantum AG
26. Algorithmiq S.r.l.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Drivers
  • 4.2.1 Expansion of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Workloads
  • 4.2.2 Government-Led Quantum Computing Programs and Research Funding
  • 4.2.3 Growth of Open-Source Quantum Software Ecosystems
  • 4.2.4 Rising Enterprise Demand for Quantum Algorithm Development Platforms
  • 4.2.5 Hardware-Portability Requirements Across Fragmented QPU Architectures
  • 4.2.6 Real-Time Error-Correction Software Requirements for Utility-Scale Quantum Systems
• 4.3 Market Restraints
  • 4.3.1 Limited Quantum Hardware Availability and Performance Variability
  • 4.3.2 Shortage of Quantum Software Engineering and Algorithm Development Talent
  • 4.3.3 SDK Fragmentation and Incomplete Interoperability Standards
  • 4.3.4 High Cost of Maintaining Hardware-Specific Compilation and Control Stacks
• 4.4 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
• 4.5 Industry Value-Chain Analysis
• 4.6 Technology Outlook
• 4.7 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.8 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.8.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.8.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Software Development Kit Type
  • 5.1.1 Core Quantum Development
  • 5.1.2 Hardware-Specific
  • 5.1.3 Compiler and Transpiler
  • 5.1.4 Quantum Error Correction
  • 5.1.5 Quantum Control and Calibration
  • 5.1.6 Hybrid Quantum-Classical
  • 5.1.7 Domain-Specific
  • 5.1.8 Other Software Development Kit Types
• 5.2 By Deployment Mode
  • 5.2.1 Cloud-Based
  • 5.2.2 On-Premises
  • 5.2.3 Hybrid
• 5.3 By Application
  • 5.3.1 Optimization
  • 5.3.2 Quantum Machine Learning
  • 5.3.3 Chemistry and Materials Simulation
  • 5.3.4 Drug Discovery
  • 5.3.5 Financial Modeling
  • 5.3.6 Cryptography and Security
  • 5.3.7 Quantum NLP
  • 5.3.8 Other Applications
• 5.4 By End-User Industry
  • 5.4.1 IT and Telecommunication
  • 5.4.2 BFSI
  • 5.4.3 Healthcare and Life Sciences
  • 5.4.4 Retail and E-Commerce
  • 5.4.5 Industrial Manufacturing
  • 5.4.6 Education and Research Institutions
  • 5.4.7 Media and Entertainment
  • 5.4.8 Government and Administration
  • 5.4.9 Energy and Utilities
  • 5.4.10 Other End-User Industries
• 5.5 By Geography
  • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
  • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
  • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Russia
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 India
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Southeast Asia
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.5.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.2 Nigeria
      • 5.5.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 IBM Corporation
  • 6.4.2 Google LLC
  • 6.4.3 Amazon Web Services, Inc.
  • 6.4.4 Microsoft Corporation
  • 6.4.5 Quantinuum Ltd.
  • 6.4.6 D-Wave Quantum Inc.
  • 6.4.7 IonQ, Inc.
  • 6.4.8 Rigetti Computing, Inc.
  • 6.4.9 Xanadu Quantum Technologies Inc.
  • 6.4.10 Pasqal SAS
  • 6.4.11 Classiq Technologies Ltd.
  • 6.4.12 Quantum Computing Inc.
  • 6.4.13 Riverlane Ltd.
  • 6.4.14 Q-CTRL Pty Ltd
  • 6.4.15 QuEra Computing Inc.
  • 6.4.16 qBraid Inc
  • 6.4.17 Oxford Quantum Circuits plc
  • 6.4.18 1QB Information Technologies
  • 6.4.19 Quantum Machines
  • 6.4.20 Infleqtion, Inc.
  • 6.4.21 QC Ware Corp.
  • 6.4.22 Strangeworks, Inc.
  • 6.4.23 BlueQubit, Inc.
  • 6.4.24 Multiverse Computing S.L.
  • 6.4.25 Terra Quantum AG
  • 6.4.26 Algorithmiq S.r.l.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment